In "Unraveling Book Resurrects the Ancient Astronaut Theme," writer Morten St. George asserts that a portion of Nostradamus's predictions is of outsider inception and that those predictions disclose to us how to figure the galactic directions of where E.T. came from. In a subsequent meeting, I suggested the accompanying conversation starter to St. George: Do you concur that contact with savvy outsiders could be vital to humanity? He concurred. At that point, I asked: Do you concur that this is a higher priority than your selling a couple of duplicates of your mysterious reasoning book? He concurred. This article will be somewhat more and somewhat more specialized than the others.
As indicated by St. George, three prophetic verses join to give data about E.T's. Area. The first of these is refrain number I-81. Here, the fourth section's initial four expressions are the most applicable: "Kappa, Theta, Lambda, more." St. George says he has an etymological word reference that characterizes "mors" as the "chomp of a scorpion." Consequently, Kappa, Theta, and Lambda are three stars in the tail segment of the heavenly body Scorpius. (Note that the utilization of Greek letters for star names postdates Nostradamus). It's a star bolt, and Lambda is the arrow point. Somewhere else, the predictions name three urban communities to shape a bolt hovering far and wide; in this manner, St. George accepts the three stars ought to be seen as focuses on a circle.
Where does the star bolt point? St. George says he followed the star bolt upwards on a star guide and it hit or passed near a foreboding shadow called Barnard 72, for which he previously had different signs. So that is the appropriate response. E.T. came from or close to Barnard 72. In any case, we're not done at this point. We're searching for exact directions.
The subsequent refrain is numbered IV-32. As indicated by St. George's translation, this verse recounts a story: Once upon a period, Triton, Pluto, and Charon shaped a triple planet framework with a particular circle around the Sun. One day, the outsiders went along, grasped Triton, and drove it into a retrograde circle around the planet Neptune. In course to Neptune, Pluto and Charon held tight for some time, at that point severed free and floated into another circle. When did this occur? St. George says the outsiders were here in 580 A.D., so that would be his conjecture for the date of these planet controls.
I referenced that I had perused on the Internet that Pluto has been downsized, that it is not, at this point thought about a planet. St. George reacted: "I accept that was because they found that Pluto didn't clean up trash in its circle. In any case, since 580 A.D., a contemporary date as far as nearby planetary group history, Pluto in its new circle would have made just a modest bunch of complete circles around the Sun, scarcely sufficient opportunity to gather up a lot of trash. Regardless, the stargazers failed to understand the situation. They should be searching for Triton's unique circle; a got out circle with no planet in it. Furthermore, I question that we're discussing a circle at the close planetary system's external edges. Triton's unique circle may have been nearer to the Sun than Neptune. They have to sort out where Triton might have been in 580 A.D.; at that point, they will realize where to search for that circle."
For what reason did the outsiders move Triton? A showcase of intensity? St. George commented that the star bolt gives longitudinal directions. We likewise need to know the scope. The planets must be in the perfect situation at the perfect time. Furthermore, the three stars as well, besides.
The last refrain of the three verses is numbered IV-33. It starts: Jupiter closer to Venus than to the Moon, showing up in full whiteness. As indicated by St. George, Earth and Jupiter would need to be practically on inverse sides of the Sun for this to be valid, and the full Moon (more probable seen from the Alien Planet than from Earth) fills in as a clock. The arrangement is Alien Planet, Sun, Moon.
The following line of IV-33 goes: Venus covered up under the whiteness Neptune (found more than 200 years after the passing of Nostradamus). Note that there's no "off" among whiteness and Neptune. In the interim, the French words following "covered up" (utilized somewhere else in the predictions to obscure closures), "soUS la bonheur," permits the extraction of "Uranus." Thus, the whiteness (incomplete as opposed to full) is Uranus, not Neptune, and we have a subsequent arrangement: Alien Planet, Uranus, Venus.
IV-33 has one more line: From Mars struck through the white silo. Neptune was left hanging toward the finish of the former line; it should become possibly the most important factor here, which means Neptune from Mars struck through the white storehouse. As indicated by St. George, the "white storehouse" alludes to a star group called the Pleiades, which ends up lying at the contrary side of the sky from Barnard 72. Up to this point, St. George thought the planetary bolt to Barnard 72 started with Mars, so he not yet got an opportunity to look at if a Mars, Neptune, Pleiades arrangement, or a Pleiades, Mars, Neptune arrangement is even plausible.
Generally speaking, there are just a predetermined number of conceivable outcomes. IV-33 gives us two internal planets, Venus and Mars, and two external planets, Uranus and Neptune. Mars lines up with Neptune to hit the Pleiades, and Venus lines up with Uranus to hit the Alien Planet. Contingent on the Pleiades course, Uranus and Neptune should be together on a similar side of the nearby planetary group or legitimately restricting the nearby planetary group's closures. Additionally, make sure to watch that you're seeing a full Moon from the Alien Planet and that Jupiter is nearer to Venus than the Moon simultaneously. When? The skies and planets are inconsistent movements. In what year does this occur?
St. George is persuaded that the given setup's date ought to some way or another or someplace be given in the predictions. Other than the refrain number, 433, we have 580, 700, 703, 882, 883, 1204, 1559, 1571, 1607, 1609, 1649, 1666, 1689, 1690, 1700, 1727, 1781, 1813, 1832, 1858, 1859, 1861, 1928, 1952, 1955, 1979, 1982, 1999, 2001, and 2006. The years 1571, 1607, 1781, 1859, and 1982 were space science related. St. George associates one with the later years as more probable chiefly because space experts might not have precise information on the external planets' situation in prior occasions. "We need to accept that they need us to take care of business, and exactness is obviously needed here."
2006? What occurred in 2006? St. George answered: "Literally nothing. 2006 was every second, inferable date in a London disaster refrain. The date doesn't really need to come from a space science verse. It tends to be given somewhere else."
If you don't mind, pardon the straying. My last inquiry was: Do you sensibly anticipate that SETI space experts should take you up on this arrange stuff? St. George reacted: "Yes. It would be stupid of them not to. How they're going now, their chances of discovering E.T. are not so much as one out of many. If my hypotheses lessen the chances to one out of many, their odds improve colossally. Besides, I think they've failed to remember; SETI was initially founded on the reason that there are bunches of savvy human advancements out there, which thusly infers that at any rate, one of them ought to have to prevail with regards to investigating the whole system at this point."
So there you have it, SETI space experts, go forward and get popular, work out the directions, point your radio telescope there, and tell the world you got with E.T.!
You must be logged in to post a comment.